The draft law was posted keep going Wednesday on the data service's site. Remarks and perspectives on the draft can be posted up until 4 May. The data service has masterminded a meeting to examine the draft with partners on 5 May.
The draft law expresses that no individual influenced by the procurements, requests or statements of the demonstration can document charges against any priest or concerned senior authority.
An authority of the data service, staying mysterious, said that numerous administration authorities need to take choices by goodness of their office. They ought not assume individual liability for that.
Attorney Tanjeeb Ul Alam, who assumed the principle part in drafting the law, told Prothom Alo, nobody will complete their obligations bravely unless there is an exemption condition. The clergymen's names won't be specified so nobody can guide fingers to a specific persons.
The national show approach paper was distributed on 6 August 2014, making sharp response inside the media. The data service framed a 40-membe commission to set up the draft law.
Fines: If TV is completed disregarding the demonstration, the permit of the concerned association will be disavowed and a fine of up to Tk 100 million will be forced. There will be no extension for remuneration for anybody harmed by the requests and procurements of the demonstration. The matter can't be taken to court or the higher powers.
On the off chance that any such grumbling it raised, the court or concerned power can specifically dismiss it, with regards to article 24(4) of the demonstration, which expresses that the commission has the power to cross out, correct or suspend a permit. The commission does not have the power to issue a permit, but rather it can put suggestions to the legislature for issuing a permit.
Tanjeeb Ul Alam told Prothom Alo that if the court or the powers dismiss a pay supplication, there is extension to record a writ appeal.
Infringement of the show law can likewise be viewed as a criminal offense, with the burden of a jail sentence of a most extreme three months and a base fine of Tk 300 thousand. On the off chance that the infringement proceeds with, the denounced will need to pay a Tk. 100 thousand fine day by day. Article 28 of the demonstration has procurement for claim in the High Court.
Media specialists say, given the overall circumstances, there is sufficient degree for abusing this law. The media powers generally speaking hold fast to the laws relating to freedom, sway, disdain of court and should sign reports relating to these while getting a permit.
Manabjamin Boss Proofreader Matiur Rahman Chowdhury said he felt the demonstration would undermine individual opportunity and flexibility of expression. It would make turmoil inside the media. He said that whatever the intention might be behind this demonstration, by the day's end, the media that would confront the most harm. While sanctioning the uncommon forces act in 1974, the state priest for data at the time, Taher Uddin Thakur, had termed the law a resting tiger. What's more, it did later eat up the media, with numerous daily papers being shut down and columnists captured.
Tahmina Rahman, executive of Article 19, said globally the best practice is not to apply the criminal laws against flexibility of expression unless there is no option. In any case, she pretty much concurred with alternate procurements of the draft demonstration and the development of a free and self-governing commission.
Data counsel to the head administrator and individual from the draft board of trustees, Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury, said the law or establishment loses significance if there is no procurement for discipline, similar to the instance of the press chamber. He said so long the telecast media had been in the hands of the administration or the service. Presently, left to the commission, the media will be autonomous and individuals arranged.
No comments:
Write comments